His work represents a rare fusion—rigorous academic theory applied to the messy, vibrant reality of Nigerian and African governance. To understand Ojobi’s bibliography, one must first understand his central thesis: law without social context is a dead tool. His writing consistently argues that for legal systems to be effective in post-colonial Africa, they must be decolonized not just in text, but in application.

His primary audience remains academics (law, political science, African studies), legal practitioners, judges, and policy advisors. But his work on ethics and corruption has found a secondary readership among journalists and civil society activists. No profile would be complete without noting the critiques. Some scholars argue that Ojobi over-romanticizes customary law, glossing over its patriarchal and exclusionary elements. Others say his proposed hybrid systems are administratively impractical in under-resourced states.

The book offers no easy solutions, but provides a diagnostic toolkit that has been adopted by anti-corruption agencies in Ghana, Kenya, and Nigeria’s ICPC. Perhaps his most practical work. Based on fifteen years of field research across Benue, Plateau, and Ogun states, this book documents how formal land titles and indigenous tenure systems clash in the courts. Ojobi argues for a hybrid land registry that records both statutory deeds and customary allocations.

Ojobi’s response, typically delivered with a dry chuckle in interviews: "The perfect is the enemy of the functional. I offer functional, not paradise."

There is also the quiet contradiction of his career: a fierce critic of judicial dependence, yet he has served as a consultant to three state governors and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). He defends this as "reform from within, not exile." For the general reader interested in African governance and ethics: Begin with Ethics, Corruption, and the African Public Sphere (2013). It is his most accessible and urgently relevant work.