Underwater Acoustic Characterisation Of Unexploded Ordnance Disposal Using Deflagration May 2026

Acoustic characterisation further reveals a crucial spectral shift. While detonation deposits energy uniformly across a wide band (10 Hz to >100 kHz), deflagration concentrates its energy in the low-frequency regime, typically below 500 Hz. This frequency content is governed by the bubble pulse—the oscillation of the hot gas bubble created by the deflagration. Unlike the violent, high-frequency collapse of a detonation bubble, a deflagration bubble undergoes slower, larger-amplitude oscillations. For marine mammals, this low-frequency bias is a double-edged sword. Many baleen whales communicate in these low frequencies, meaning deflagration could potentially mask vocalisations over long distances. However, the lack of high-frequency energy is beneficial for smaller cetaceans and fish, which are often more sensitive to frequencies above 1 kHz. Moreover, the low frequencies attenuate more slowly in water, but because the absolute source level is lower, the overall radius of impact for physiological harm is dramatically reduced.

Despite its advantages, the acoustic characterisation of deflagration reveals several operational challenges. First, the process is less predictable than detonation. Variations in casing thickness, age of the explosive, and venting geometry cause shot-to-shot variability in the acoustic output. This uncertainty complicates risk assessment for protected species. Second, the longer duration of the acoustic event means that mitigation measures (e.g., marine mammal observers, passive acoustic monitoring) must be maintained for a longer window. Third, while the peak pressure is lower, the low-frequency bubble pulse can travel long distances with little attenuation, potentially disturbing species like the North Atlantic right whale over many kilometres, albeit without causing direct injury. Unlike the violent, high-frequency collapse of a detonation

To understand the acoustic benefits of deflagration, one must first contrast it with the physics of detonation. A high-order detonation involves a supersonic reaction front that generates a discontinuous pressure wave—a shock. In water, which is nearly incompressible, this shock propagates with devastating efficiency. The key acoustic parameters of a detonation are extremely high peak pressure (often exceeding 200 dB re 1µPa at 1m), a very short rise time (microseconds), and a high-amplitude, broad-frequency spectrum extending into ultrasonic ranges. This impulsive sound is particularly harmful to marine life, causing barotrauma (tissue damage from pressure changes), temporary or permanent hearing loss, and behavioural disruption over vast areas (tens of kilometres). However, the lack of high-frequency energy is beneficial

The practical acoustic characterisation of deflagration involves not just measuring pressure, but also derived metrics relevant to environmental regulation. Key metrics include Sound Exposure Level (SEL), which integrates the total acoustic energy over time, and peak-to-peak pressure. For a detonation, the SEL is concentrated in a few milliseconds; for deflagration, the same or lower total energy is spread over a longer duration. This results in a lower instantaneous peak pressure but a potentially comparable cumulative SEL at close range. Therefore, a comprehensive characterisation must assess the risk of behavioural disturbance (e.g., avoidance of feeding grounds) versus physical injury. Studies using caged fish and acoustic tags have shown that while fish may startle at the onset of deflagration, they rarely exhibit the lethal barotrauma (swim bladder rupture) common after detonations. For a detonation