The stagflation era paved the way for an even more radical critique led by Robert Lucas and Thomas Sargent: Rational Expectations. They argued that people do not simply extrapolate the past (adaptive expectations); they use all available information, including their understanding of the policy regime itself, to form forecasts. This implied that even the short-run trade-off could disappear if a policy change is anticipated.
By credibly anchoring long-term inflation expectations, central banks broke the self-fulfilling spiral of inflationary psychology. In this modern synthesis, the Phillips Curve became very flat in the short run: large movements in unemployment produced only small changes in inflation. This gave central banks more room to respond to recessions without fear of igniting inflation. However, the flattening of the curve also presented a new puzzle: if inflation no longer responds strongly to labor market slack, how should central banks fight deflationary recessions? The 2008 Global Financial Crisis tested this, as massive increases in unemployment failed to cause significant deflation, leading to fears of a "liquidity trap." Macroeconomia
In 1958, New Zealand-born economist A.W. Phillips published a seminal paper documenting a negative statistical relationship between unemployment rates and the rate of wage inflation in the United Kingdom from 1861 to 1957. American economists Paul Samuelson and Robert Solow soon replicated this finding for the U.S. economy, coining the term "Phillips Curve." They presented it as a "menu of choice" for policymakers. The stagflation era paved the way for an
The Elusive Equilibrium: Inflation, Unemployment, and the Evolution of Macroeconomic Policy However, the flattening of the curve also presented